Scott M. Anderson

Partner
Loading the player...
anderson@gta-injurylaw.com
Download VCard

Phone: 864.421.0770
 Fax: 864.752.0863


Education

J.D., University of South Carolina School of Law, 1989

B.A., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986

Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice

South Carolina, 1989
North Carolina, 1990
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, 1990
U.S. District Court, South Carolina District, 1990
U.S. District Court, North Carolina Western District, 1993
U.S. District Court, North Carolina Middle District, 1997
Cherokee Supreme Court (Eastern Band), 2007
United States Supreme Court, 2009
U.S. District Court, North Carolina Eastern District, 2012

Professional & Bar Association Memberships

American Association for Justice

South Carolina Association for Justice

North Carolina Advocates for Justice

Injured Workers' Advocates of South Carolina - member

South Carolina Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Association, Former Board Member

South Carolina Workers Compensation Educational Association - member

Appellate Cases

  • Escobar v. Federal Express Corp., 2011-UP-199467, S.C. Ct. App. (2011)
  • Shelton v. Steelcase, Inc., __N.C.App.__, 677 S.E.2d 485 (2009); disc. rev. denied, __N.C.__, 682 S.E.2d 389 (2009)
  • Hendricks v. Clemson University, 353 S.C. 449, 578 S.E. 2d 711 (2003)
  • Warren v. Merastar Insurance Co., 2002-UP-789, S.C. Ct. App. (2002)
  • Greene v. Absorba Oshkosh and Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 2000-UP-N.C. Ct. App. (2000)
  • Hendricks v. Clemson University, 339 S.C. 552, 529 S.E. 2d 293 Ct. App. (2000)
  • Mitch Contracting Co. v. Terra Nova Insurance, 2000-UP-033, S.C. Ct App. (2000)
  • Morasco v. Dunklin Fire Dept. & S.C. Uninsured Employer's Fund, 2000-UP-324 S.C. Ct. App. (2000)
  • Zeager v. Mitch Contracting Co., 1998-UP-337 (1998)
  • Minarovich v. Textile Stores & Companion Property & Casualty, 97-UP-336 S.C. Ct. App. (1997)
  • Revis v. Allshouse and Auto Owners Insurance, 94-UP-185, S.C. Ct. App. (1994)
  • Mosley v. Bi-Lo, Inc., 93-UP-S.C. Ct. App. (1993)
  • First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Stephens, 91-UP-S.C. Ct. App. (1991)
  • Rouse v. Rouse, 91-UP-118 S.C. Ct. App. (1991)
  • Wright v. General Heating and Air, 306 S.C. 331, 411 S.E.2d 829 Ct. App. (1991)

Each case is different, so not all information on this website, as well as some which may not be provided, will apply to every case. Because the facts and relevant laws are different from case to case, Grimes Teich Anderson does not guarantee that the outcome, results or experiences with one lawyer or one case will be similar to another.

**Except for Employment Law Cases, Attorney’s fees are a percentage of the entire recovery and will be deducted before other expenses. In addition to the fee in these cases, Client will be responsible for litigation expenses, which will either be deducted from the recovery or paid by the client. Some Employment Law Cases may be handled on a contingent fee basis and others handled on an hourly basis, where the client is billed for the hours spent on the case. Based on our experience, we will advise you of the most appropriate fee arrangement in Employment Law cases.

Material on this website is for information purposes and is not legal advice.