Physiomesh

Physiomesh is a medical device produced by Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson. The mesh is used in open ventral hernia surgeries and is advertised as a revolutionary improvement on its predecessors in hernia repair technology. Despite significant success for patients regardless of sex, age, and other risk factors, Physiomesh has also shown to be dangerous to some patients whose doctors used the device in their hernia repair surgery. In these unfortunate cases, the postoperative risks for Physiomesh patients have included recurrent hernias, as well as obstructions of the bowels, infections, and other problems. If you have been hurt because of Physiomesh, please call one of our North Carolina and South Carolina product injury lawyers today.

Physiomesh is made from polypropylene, a nontoxic plastic used in manufacturing and many consumer goods. The mesh is stacked between two layers of different surgical polymers and fixed in hernia patients, helping to stabilize the stretched tissues surrounding a hernia bulge. The polypropylene mesh is not itself absorbable, but the polymer layers surrounding the mesh are designed to help the surgical site heal more quickly and easily. This design was supposed to be a basic upgrade from pre-existing Ethicon product lines for hernia repair meshes, and Ethicon used the United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) fast-track product approval process to get Physiomesh on the market with great speed. This process, called the 501(k) approval program, only requires that medical device manufacturers prove that new products are sufficiently similar to older, FDA-approved technologies. Unfortunately, some people have suffered terrible injuries because of Physiomesh. If you are one of those people, it won’t cost you a thing to talk to our North Carolina and South Carolina personal injury lawyers about your case. We can help protect your rights and get you the benefits to which you may be entitled.

The FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database now lists many cases of failed Physiomesh implantation, with serious adhesion issues occurring in many patients. In one extreme case, a patient’s Physiomesh migrated to their small intestine, and not only was an additional hernia repair surgery necessary but part of the small intestine had to be removed to save the patient’s life. Physiomesh has also failed to incorporate into patients’ bodies, caused major inflammation, and folded/bunched up at the site of installation.

No one goes into surgery, especially for a painful and difficult hernia situation, with plans for more operations than they need. Our injury lawyers at Grimes Teich Anderson, are accepting cases against Ethicon and its parent corporation, Johnson and Johnson, for negligence, failure to adequately disclose device risks, and poor product testing. In some cases, Ethicon is also being sued for false advertising, and for marketing the product despite knowledge of its flaws. We have the experience, knowledge and national relationships needed to challenge companies like Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon.

In cases against corporations with the legal strength of Ethicon and J&J, injured patients are advised not to go it alone in seeking the damages to which they may be entitled because of their Physiomesh injury. Without the advice and representation of an experienced product injury attorney, victims may make mistakes that could erode their legal rights and potential financial payout. The stakes are too high to self-represent in a case involving a recalled medical device like the Ethicon Physiomesh.

Each case is different, so not all information on this website, as well as some which may not be provided, will apply to every case. Because the facts and relevant laws are different from case to case, Grimes Teich Anderson does not guarantee that the outcome, results or experiences with one lawyer or one case will be similar to another.

Except for Employment Law Cases, Attorney’s fees are a percentage of the entire recovery and will be deducted before other expenses. In addition to the fee in these cases, Client will be responsible for litigation expenses, which will either be deducted from the recovery or paid by the client. Some Employment Law Cases may be handled on a contingent fee basis and others handled on an hourly basis, where the client is billed for the hours spent on the case. Based on our experience, we will advise you of the most appropriate fee arrangement in Employment Law cases.

Material on this website is for information purposes and is not legal advice.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mr. Anderson represented my husband, Duane Carter during a recent car accident claim. We were try to get the medical bills and pain reimbursement resolved with the insurance company. They were great at keeping us current with any progress or problems that occurred during the process of our claim. The law firm of Grimes, Teich & Anderson are very people oriented and care deeply about their clients. I would highly recommend anyone in a similar situation use this law firm to resolve their claim.
★★★★★
Brian, I want to thank you and Ms. Willetts for all of your help during the appeal. Your expertise and approachable personality was truly welcomed, and having you present for the SSA hearing reduced my anxieties about the process. I will gladly refer others to you if they are needing assistance with disability or injury. If I were to encounter trouble with the SSA in the future, you will be my first contact. Your professionalism is a step above. Will Pitman
★★★★★
All veterans with a claim feeling you don't have a chance or feel defeated need to make contact with Grimes Teich Anderson and let qualified personnel get you through claims procedures. They will evaluate your claim and work through it with you from beginning to end and treat you with compassion and caring. William E.
★★★★★
We received exceptional assistance with a very difficult situation. Jessica Leaven and her team were thorough and clear throughout the entire process. We are grateful for her assistance and would recommend her to others who are seeking simple guidance or formal representation. Rebecca H.
★★★★★
Henry Teich is an outstanding attorney who aggressively represented me in a complex workers compensation injury case. Hank has been handling WC injury cases for may years and knows all the new NC statutes concerning WC! Tony M.