IVC Filter Lawsuit Lawyers | Product Liability Attorneys
Harmed By An IVC Filter? We're Here To Help.
Patients have reported serious complications arising out of implanted IVC filters, or in the removal of IVC filters. If you or a loved one has suffered harm due to a defective IVC filter, contact our team for help.

Many people hope to reduce their risk of a pulmonary embolism with Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filter placement. Some patients, however, have suffered serious complications arising out of implanted IVC filters, or in the removal of IVC filters. In situations in which the manufacturer’s negligence may have caused your harm, the North Carolina and South Carolina IVC filter lawyers at Grimes Teich Anderson LLP can help you evaluate your legal options. Our product liability attorneys are experienced litigators who can provide knowledgeable and comprehensive advice to victims of faulty IVC filters and their family members.
Current Facts About IVC Filters and Related Complications
An IVC filter is placed within the inferior vena cava, a large vein in the abdomen that returns de-oxygenated blood from the lower body to the heart and lungs. An IVC filter is designed to prevent large blood clots originating in the legs or pelvis from reaching the lungs, where they could cause a pulmonary embolism. Typically, IVC filters are used in cases in which a patient is at risk for a pulmonary embolism, and anticoagulant medications have been unsuccessful, or the patient is unable to tolerate anticoagulation therapy. IVC filters are manufactured by several companies and are available as permanently implanted devices or optionally retrievable filters. Retrievable IVC filters, although designed to be removable, may be challenging to retrieve, especially if they are left implanted for a long time. Complications may also arise if the IVC filter punctures, penetrates through, or becomes embedded in the vein, if fragments break off the IVC filter and travel to the heart, lungs, and other parts of the body, or if the entire filter migrates to other parts of the body.
Client Reviews
When medical device manufacturers put profits ahead of patient safety, people can suffer serious and lasting harm. The dangerous product lawyers at Grimes Teich Anderson fight to hold IVC filter manufacturers accountable and help patients across North and South Carolina pursue compensation for injuries caused by defective or poorly designed IVC filters. With more than 40 years of experience, our attorneys are trusted advocates for those harmed by IVC filter complications.
Awesome firm! Chris Connolly took time to listen and review our situation. He was very honest and upfront about the process and potential outcomes. My daughter’s case has some complexities and Chris explained every detail and possibility. Bottom line, he fought for us and won!!! I would rate them 10 stars if possible.
Choosing Grimes Teich Anderson for my SS Disability appeal was the best decision I could have made. Kathy Willets walked me through the entire process and kept me well informed throughout. She was always responsive to my questions and handled everything with kindness and complete professionalism. Highly recommend this group for your disability claims.
Kathy & the team handled my case efficiently, effectively & professionally resulting in a favorable outcome!
I had the chance to speak with Anna Hamrick and Katie Gates, and their professionalism truly stood out. From 2024 to 2026, everything was handled well, with a level of confidence, honesty, and calm presence. They took their time with me, explained everything clearly, and treated me with real care and respect. Their dedication and work ethic are admirable; I’m genuinely grateful for the way they guided me.
Needing an attorney was never something I wanted to need, but I did and thanks to Anna H. and Katie G. it was not so overwhelming. Having to deal with a legal issue and having a trusted attorney is key. I had no idea what to expect during the duration of the time I needed legal representation but Anna and Katie not only keep me well informed but also explained things to me in a way that made sense. If you happen to find yourself in need of legal representation I highly recommend them.
Awesome, would highly recommend.

Legal Recourse For Injuries Caused by Faulty IVC Filters
Litigation associated with IVC filters has involved claims of negligence, design defects, manufacturing defects, failures to warn, breaches of implied warranty, negligent misrepresentations, and other causes of action against manufacturers of IVC filters and their subsidiaries. An IVC filter attorney at our North Carolina and South Carolina firm can help you determine whether some of these claims may apply to your situation.
In North Carolina, a plaintiff may prevail against a product manufacturer on a claim based on inadequate design if the plaintiff proves that the manufacturer acted unreasonably in designing the product and that this conduct caused harm to the plaintiff. In addition, the plaintiff must prove that either:
- The manufacturer failed to adopt a safer, feasible, and reasonable alternative design that would have prevented or substantially reduced the risk of harm without substantially impairing the practicality or desirability of the product; or
- The design of the product was so unreasonable that a person who was aware of the relevant facts would not use it.
Some of the statutory factors considered when determining whether the manufacturer was unreasonable in designing its product include the nature and severity of the risks in light of the foreseeable uses of the product, the user’s likely awareness of those risks, whether the product conformed to applicable government standards, and the technical and practical feasibility of using an alternative design.
North Carolina law may also allow plaintiffs to recover damages on a claim based on inadequate warnings or instructions. To succeed, the plaintiff must establish that a manufacturer or seller unreasonably failed to provide an adequate warning, and this failure caused the plaintiff’s injury. The plaintiff must also prove that either the product created an unreasonably dangerous condition that the defendant knew or should have known would pose a substantial risk of harm, or after the product left the defendant’s control, it became aware or should have known that the product posed a substantial risk of harm, but it failed to give warnings or take any other reasonable actions. An experienced product liability attorney can provide more information regarding these claims and others that may apply in your situation.
Receive Guidance from an Experienced IVC Filter Lawyer in North Carolina or South Carolina
Franklin, North Carolina Office
Greenville, South Carolina Office
Rutherfordton, North Carolina Office
Spruce Pine, North Carolina Office
Waynesville, North Carolina Office
Legal Dislaimer
*Each case is different, so not all information on this website, as well as some that may not be provided, will apply to every case. Because the facts and relevant laws are different from case to case, Grimes Teich Anderson does not guarantee that the outcome, results, or experiences with one lawyer or one case will be similar to another.
Except for Employment Law Cases, attorneys' fees are a percentage of the entire recovery and will be deducted before other expenses. In addition to the fee in these cases, Client will be responsible for litigation expenses, which will either be deducted from the recovery or paid by the client. Some Employment Law Cases may be handled on a contingency fee basis, and others handled on an hourly basis, where the client is billed for the hours spent on the case. Based on our experience, we will advise you of the most appropriate fee arrangement in Employment Law cases.
Material on this website is for information purposes and is not legal advice.